Commentary: The moratorium on exporting LNG hurts this state and Europe too

The following OpEd by ConservAmerica President Jeff Kupfer appeared in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

In 2016, af­ter a lengthy per­mit ap­proval pro­cess, the United States ex­ported its first cargo of liq­ui­fied nat­u­ral gas from the lower 48 states. Since then, the U.S. has leap­frogged ev­ery other coun­try to be­come the world’s larg­est ex­porter of LNG.

But in in Jan­u­ary, fol­low­ing the same play­book that Pres­i­dent Bar­rack Obama used for LNG and the Key­stone XL Pipe­line dur­ing his 2012 re­elec­tion cam­paign, Pres­i­dent Joe Biden an­nounced a “tem­po­rary pause” on LNG ex­port ap­prov­als.

A de­struc­tive pause

Why would he do such a thing? The ad­min­is­tra­tion cites the need for up­dated eco­nomic and en­vi­ron­men­tal anal­y­ses. But as with Obama, the mo­ti­va­tion for the pol­icy change is clear — and it comes out in the pres­i­dent’s own state­ment, in which he ref­er­enced the cli­mate de­ni­al­ism of MAGA Re­pub­li­cans and the need to “heed the calls of young peo­ple and front­line com­mu­ni­ties.”

At the re­cent CERAWeek en­ergy con­fer­ence, Energy Sec­re­tary Jen­ni­fer Granholm tried to down­play the impact, ex­plain­ing that by next year’s con­fer­ence, this is­sue would be in the “rear view mir­ror.” But this pause could very eas­ily have real world con­se­quences.

Penn­syl­va­nia trails only Texas as the larg­est pro­ducer of nat­u­ral gas. In the com­mon­wealth, the in­dus­try sup­ports over 120,000 jobs and con­trib­utes al­most $50 bil­lion in eco­nomic ac­tiv­ity. Dur­ing a No­vem­ber 2023 meet­ing of the bi­par­ti­san Phil­a­del­phia LNG Ex­port Task Force, Chair Mar­tina White noted that nat­u­ral gas re­sources “not only fuel eco­nomic growth within the Com­mon­wealth, but also of­fer us a unique op­por­tu­nity to meet grow­ing en­ergy de­mand across the globe.”

LNG ex­ports aren’t just good for eco­nomic growth, they are in­stru­men­tal for achiev­ing U.S. en­vi­ron­men­tal and for­eign pol­icy goals. First, those ex­ports have as­sisted many coun­tries, es­pe­cially in Asia, in back­ing out coal, thereby help­ing re­duce global emis­sions.

Europe needs LNG

Second, they have been a life­line for our clos­est al­lies. In 2023, the U.S. was the larg­est LNG sup­plier to Europe for the third con­sec­u­tive year.

Nearly two-thirds of the U.S. LNG ex­ports went to Europe in 2022, help­ing al­lies such as Ger­many loosen Rus­sia’s grip on their en­ergy sup­plies. With only 10% of Europe’s gas needs met by its own pro­duc­tion, a lengthy U.S. ex­port mor­a­to­rium could even­tu­ally send many of those coun­tries back to Rus­sia for sup­plies.

Or, as many en­ergy an­a­lysts sug­gest, sup­ply could shift to Qatar, which is the world’s low­est cost pro­ducer. Com­ment­ing on a re­cent Qa­tari an­nounce­ment about a sig­nifi­cant ex­pan­sion of that coun­try’s LNG ca­pac­ity, one an­a­lyst noted, “The sig­nal the U.S. proj­ects need to take from this (is): if they don’t go ahead, some­one will.” More­over, one should not for­get that Qatar sits in a tur­bu­lent re­gion, re­ly­ing upon ship­ping lanes vul­ner­a­ble to ha­rass­ment by the Houthis and oth­ers.

The eco­nomic con­se­quences of the pause, as well as the dan­ger­ous global im­pli­ca­tions, have led to mount­ing push­back, es­pe­cially among Penn­syl­va­nia’s Dem­o­crats who likely rec­og­nize real po­lit­i­cal dan­ger.

In a joint state­ment, Sena­tors John Fetter­man and Bob Ca­sey de­clared that they would push for a re­ver­sal, ex­plain­ing, “This in­dus­try has cre­ated good-pay­ing en­ergy jobs in towns and com­mu­ni­ties across the Com­mon­wealth and has played a crit­i­cal role in pro­mot­ing U.S. en­ergy in­de­pen­dence.”

Demo­cratic Gover­nor Josh Sha­piro has also ex­pressed res­er­va­tions, urg­ing the pres­i­dent at least to limit the mor­a­to­rium. Demo­cratic Reps. Chris Deluzio and Su­san Wild, who rep­resent swing dis­tricts in the state, have voiced their own con­cerns, fo­cus­ing on how it may af­fect the tens of thou­sands of peo­ple who work in the nat­u­ral gas in­dus­try.

For their part, Penn­syl­va­nia vot­ers aren’t crazy over the pres­i­dent’s LNG mor­a­to­rium ei­ther. A re­cent poll shows 58% op­pose Biden’s move, with 41% less likely to vote for him be­cause of it.

Give up the moratorium

It’s not too late for the Biden Ad­min­is­tra­tion to shift course and give up the moratorium. LNG ex­ports have cre­ated jobs in Penn­syl­va­nia and across the U.S., opened fruit­ful lanes of ex­port for al­lies abroad look­ing to step out of Rus­sia’s en­ergy stran­gle­hold, and made us the world’s leader in a grow­ing mar­ket.

The ef­fects of walk­ing away from such suc­cess will harm state and lo­cal econ­o­mies in Penn­syl­va­nia, as well as our al­lies across the At­lan­tic who’ve counted on, and who need, our LNG ex­ports.

Jeff Kupfer, an adjunct faculty member at Carnegie Mellon University’s Heinz College, is a former acting deputy secretary in the U.S. Energy Department and former special assistant to the president for economic policy. He also serves as president of ConservAmerica. His previous article was “Being bought was good for U.S. Steel and for Pittsburgh.”

First Published March 23, 2024, 5:30am

Meredith Kenny